Category Archives: European IQ Trainwrecks

Medication errors affect 1 in 25 in leading Irish Hospital (or does it?)

[UPDATE]: To carry home the challenges of managing and measuring the quality of information at times, Beaumont Hospital have issued the following press statement regarding the issue mentioned below (this statement is copied from the comment below).

STATEMENT BY BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RE OMBUDSMAN’S REPORT
The Office of the Ombudsman issued a report this morning which highlighted a complaint against Beaumont Hospital regarding the circumstances in which an unprescribed dosage of medication was given to a patient. In her press release, the Ombudsman made reference to an audit of the Kardex system at Beaumont. A figure of 4.3% was given for Kardex transcription errors.

For purposes of absolute clarity, Beaumont Hospital points out that this audit was of approximately 170 reported medication events over a period of two years. This showed there were seven reports of errors made in the transcription of information between Kardex. This is the 4.3% referred to by the Ombudsman and is not 4.3% of all medications administered. It should also be noted that the audit was not of the hospital’s full Kardex system.

There are approximately 500,000 prescriptions written in Beaumont each year and approximately 4.5 million administrations of medication under these prescriptions.

We thank Beaumont Hospital for the clarification presented and gladly publish it in full. The detail contained in the statement from Beaumont Hospital highlights another impact of poor quality information – the negative publicity and causes of concern that can arise from incomplete information made available to the media.

[/Update] 

The Irish Times website carries a story this afternoon of the report by the Ombudsman into medication errors in a leading Irish hospital.

According to the report, Beaumont hospital experienced medication errors in just over 1 in every 25 cases (4.3%) [Note – this figure is clarified by Beaumont Hospital in the update above]  The root cause of this error rate would seem to be the way in which medications and medication instructions are recorded, with key information being recorded manually on patient record cards and certain key data (such as frequency of dosage) occasionally being omitted for a variety of reasons. Furthermore, the transcription of information from patient record cards which have been filled up can lead to errors in transcription, resulting in errors in patient medication.[Beaumont Hospital clarification: “this audit was of approximately 170 reported medication events over a period of two years. This showed there were seven reports of errors made in the transcription of information between Kardex. This is the 4.3% referred to by the Ombudsman and is not 4.3% of all medications administered. It should also be noted that the audit was not of the hospital’s full Kardex system.”]

Given the implications of incorrect medication, both in terms of injury or death of patients or, at the very least, the increased duration of stay for a patient arising from treatment errors.

The Institute of Medicine in the US has published figures which show that the cost to the Healthcare system (in 2006 dollars) per incident of medication error was around $8750 per hospital stay. An article on the website FutureHealthCareUS.com quotes other studies which put the cost at just under $6000 per event.

Given the impact on human health and welfare (up to and including risk of death) and the financial impact on already overstretched healthcare systems, avoidable medication errors count as a definite IQ Trainwreck.

Tracker mortgage off target

RTE news today reports that AIB Bank (one of the largest banks in Ireland) has admitted an error in applying interest rate changes over a 12 month period to so-called ‘tracker’ mortgages.

This has resulted in customers having underpaid their loans in recent months. The bank is, kindly, offering the affected customers the option of paying the shortfall in one go or spread over the remaining period of their mortgage.

‘Manual Error’ is blamed for the problem, which (according to RTE) affects 500 customers.

Tracker mortgages track the base rate of a specific Central Bank (in Ireland this is the European Central Bank), with a fixed margin payable on top of the base rate.

[Update] The Irish Times this morning reports that the Irish Financial Services Regulator is to examine the Bank’s approach to recouping the under-paid mortgage amounts. Quoting a spokesperson for the Regulator:

“In instances where an institution is seeking to recoup money as a result of the failure of its own internal systems we would expect it to be flexible in terms of the arrangements it comes to with consumers”

This story is also carried in the Irish Examiner news paper today

Leap Year problem hits Irish bank

The Sunday Business Post newspaper (Ireland’s leading weekly paper dedicated to business news) carried a story this week about errors in calculating mortgage interest due to the 2008 Leap Year which have affected at least one Irish bank. This is an information quality problem we discussed previously on this blog.Of course, the bank’s are simply going to apply the interest missed out to the customer’s accounts retrospectively, with the average additional charge to customers being around €28.50, according to reports. However, the fact that this error has appeared in the national media, and the Halifax’s competitors are all stating that they have had no such problems, suggests that the cost to the bank may be greater in terms of negative PR. In this case the bank made a gross error in defining its information architecture and the core business rules for interest calculations (such as assuming 2008 was not a leap year), and it would seem their systems testing failed to catch the problem until after the event. However, as is often the case, the cost of non-quality information is being passed to the customer, making the immediate ‘problem’ go away (a shortfall in interest payments and profits) while masking the underlying root cause (failure to properly define and test information processing rules for core processes resulting in poor quality information). 

An electric (bill) shock

Courtesy of Cambridge News comes this story of a shocking electricity bill.

British Electricity provider N-Power sent a Cambridge woman a bill recently for just over stg£90million (US$ 177million). This was bemusing to her because she has availed of a pre-paid electricity meter. It would seem that for the woman to have run up such a bill would have taken over 1900 years.

As an aside, the Cambridge News article also higlights a recent survey from British website www.moneysupermarket.com:

 A survey last month showed 34 per cent of people have spotted an error in a utility or credit card bill in the past 12 months, while 17 per cent were overcharged during the past quarter.

The survey by financial website moneysupermarket.com reveals half of us don’t bother to check bills.

British Gas Billing leaves explosive whiff in the air….

The Register today reports that British Gas (aka Centrica) is taking legal action against international consulting firm Accenture after a total overhaul of their billing systems costing stg£300m resulted in customers being incorrectly billed (in some instances on multiple accounts – for one customer at the same address). British Gas claims that it has had to hire 2500 extra staff to work on fixing the problems. According to The Register, GB has already written off £200m resulting from customer complaints. This means that the minimum you should estimate for the total cost of non-quality here is a figure to the north of £500m sterling (Cost of implementation + costs of scrap and rework  = ‘First cut Cost of Non-Quality). For readers in the US, that is nearly US$1bn.

And that is BEFORE the lawyers get involved. And before you take into account the cost to British Gas of lost customer revenues when customers switch to a rival supplier to get away from the problems.

British Gas claim that Accenture are responsible for implementing  a system which didn’t work and which had “fundamental errors” in its design and implementation. Accenture, for its part, rejects the British Gas claims saying that:

“Centrica directed the design, build and implementation of the Jupiter system and insisted on many of the features they now find problematic. At their own choice, after extensive testing, in March 2006 Centrica took over total control over all aspects of the system about which they now complain and has operated the system themselves for over two years.”

Accenture will be ‘vigourously defending’ the High Court action. To translate this:

  1. It’s in the English High Court (“ka-ching” says the lawyer’s cash register)
  2. It will be an aggressive case (meaning lots of lawyers with cash registers going “ka-ching”).
  3. Customers (of Accenture and/or British Gas) will wind up paying the price in the end (the ‘Lawyers who like to say “Ka-Ching”‘ will require paying).

So, is this an IQ Trainwreck?

Yes it is. There is a significant cost to British Gas already incurred, with further costs to arise for both British Gas and Accenture. However the real impact has been on British Gas customers, who have wrestled with incorrect billing issues and related frustrations since the system went live.

Andrew Brooks, (one of our IAIDQ members in the UK and a man with some experience in these types of projects it would seem) has a nice post on his blog about the real root cause here. He makes some very valid points about who was (or should have been) driving this particular train when it went off the rails. His short post is well worth a read.

Continue reading

Aer Lingus pricing blunder brings everyone back down to earth (and now the lawyers are involved!)

The IAIDQ is holding its annual US conference (the IDQ Conference) in San Antonio this September. As a Director of the Association and a potential speaker at the event I’ve been researching my options for flying to the US as cheaply (but comfortably) as possible.

Imagine my dismay when I spotted that I’d missed an opportunity to take advantage of an IQ Trainwreck to get myself to the US on Business class for less than it costs me to get home from work!

Ireland’s RTE news is today reporting that Aer Lingus has cancelled the bookings made by passengers who tried to avail of a €5 (US$8.00 approx) Business Class fare from Dublin to the US, a flight that normally costs €1,775 (just under US$3,000). [update 2008-04-18]Patrick O’Beirne of Systems Modelling Ltd in Gorey has pointed out to me in an email that the <u>actual</u> cost of the flights was a bit higher when taxes, charges and the relative position of the sun are taken into account[/update]

This fare was available on the aerlingus.com website between 7:30am and 9:00am yesterday after (apparently) ‘promotional’ fares were loaded to the website in error. Around 100 people (some sources have it at 300 people, so I can’t vouch for the accuracy of this figure) managed to book the €5 fare, resulting in a potential loss to the airline of at least€177,700 (just under US$280,000).

The airline sent emails to the customers informing them that they had cancelled the bookings as the price was in error, however the Consumer Association has pointed out that the 100 people had valid contracts. The CEO of the National Consumer Agency has sought a meeting with the airline to discuss the situation.

The airline has argued that the fact that ‘economy class’ seats were advertised on the website at €249 should have suggested that there was an error in the €5.00 price.

However, the Press Release from the National Consumer Agency is quite clear that Aer Lingus would be in breach of contract in cancelling the flights and that “blaming a technical error in their booking system is not good enough”.

[update 2008-04-18] It has been reported this morning that a group of 50 property developers who had booked flights at the €5.00 price are starting legal proceedings to force Aer Lingus to honour their contracts. As we don’t have the concept of a class action suit here in Ireland, unless these property developers are part of a consortium that is a legal entity in its own right, that means that Aer Lingus is potentially facing 50 court cases, each requiring legal representation that will cost a lot more than the €17770 shortfall in the ticket price.

Ah… you just have to love lawyers.

Why is this an IQTrainwreck?

Cost to Aer Lingus of honouring the contracts will be €177700. The cost to the airline of the PR fall out from cancelling the contracts would also be significant. The legal costs that will arise now are also likely to be significant.

The importance of language

Courtesy (yet again) of The Register.co.uk comes this salutory tale that highlights the importance of language in Information Quality, after all it is information that is being transferred when ever we communicate and the expectations of the sender and receiver of any communication can often affect how that message is understood.

 The synopsis of the tale is this…

A young girl from London town was seeking to get a taxi to the airport so she could go on holidays. She rang directory enquiries and asked for a “Joe Baxi” (slang for Taxi apparently). The telephone operator was confused (No Mr. Baxi was listed in the area) and sought a clarification. “It’s a Cab, innit” said the young lady.

So she was put on to a company that specialises in Retail display Cabinets (Cab-inet… Cab innit… you can see how this happened). And she ordered a Cab (abbreviation for Cabinet) for 10am the following morning, price £180. She paid by credit card and the cabinet was delivered the next morning as requested.

The Register quotes the marketing manager of the cabinet company:

“We thought it was a joke at first but the girl was absolutely livid. Because she spoke in ‘Ali G’ style slang, her order was mixed up somewhat. She was absolutely baffled as to why she had a big glass display cabinet delivered outside her house, when all she wanted was a taxi to take her on holiday.”

So the IQ Trainwreck angle:

  1. The information was garbled because it was ‘non-standard’ – the use of slang with the directory enquiries company started the chain of events and prevented anyone from catching the confusion earlier… everyone thought they knew what the other person was talking about.
  2. The impact on the Cabinet company was they incurred the cost and time of a van and driver and taking a sale that wasn’t a sale…
  3. The young girl in question wound up not having transport to the airport and (we must assume) missed her flight and possibly her holiday as a result.

Similar things to this happen every day in organisations, particularly where there are no standards for information formats, standard definitions of what the things that are being managed by the business are (“what’s a customer?”) etc. etc.

What a nice model of furniture

Also from The Register is this story of a data quality boo boo on the Marks and Spencer website (the offending page has been removed from the site, but el Reg kindly kept a screenshot).

The text of an on-line catalogue entry described an item for sale, emphasising its “modern curves, soft-look styling and hardwood feet”. Unfortunately the text was presented alongside an image of a model clad in underwear and a smile. Readers of the Register did indeed admire her modern curves and soft-look styling, but the error in the information presented was at best embarrassing for M&S.

Irish bank sends debtor details to wrong addresses

The Irish Examiner reports today that a leading Irish bank accidentally sent details on defaulted loans to the wrong address. Two letters were sent to the one address – which was the wrong one. The contents of the letters contained the correct name and address information for the account holders (it appears from the media report).

This echoes an issue the same bank had in November of last year when 11,000 letters containing confidential bank details were sent to the wrong addresses.

While this most recent issue relates to just two letters relating to two customers. But the real mystery is how they both wound up at the same address.

Media trainwrecks (two of two – aka Presentation Quality is everything)

Again, with thanks to Damien Mulley we present quite possibly the best example of Information Overload in a press release. It appears that an unnamed media organisation in Dublin passed a press release on to Damien (who apart from blogging intensively and organising the Irish Blog Awards amongst other things is also a journalist).

Unfortunately they forgot to turn off ‘track changes’ in Microsoft Word and the published release contained all the drafting edits that had been done to the document since it was created. My eyes hurt me trying to read the scan of the press release that Damien posted on his blog.. if you look closely enough I swear to you that you can see dolphins or a face or something buried in the text.

Why is this a trainwreck? The press release is garbage. The ‘foot in the door’ to news agencies who might cover the event was entirely ineffective. First impressions are important and the quality of information is ultimately affected by the quality of presentation of that information. A general rule of thumb is that if your head hurts trying to figure out what the actual information is in the midst of the ‘noise’ then it’s poor quality.

Update: To cap it all off, Damien makes clear in comments on this blog post that he shouldn’t have received the release in the first place as he is a Technology journalist, not a music journalist. Again, poor quality information contributing to a trainwreck press release being sent to the wrong person (who then put it up on his blog).